Monday, March 26, 2012
Week 5 Reflection
I'm in my last week of my research class. I have many to things to be thankful for that I have learned. I have learned the steps of the research process. I have also learned the ways to critique my research as I am going through the process to ensure it is authentic. I have met with my supervisor and the research has been approved and I have already begun the data collection process.
Sunday, March 25, 2012
Supervisor Conference and Consensus
After meeting with my principal we
have come up with the following action research plan for the end of the 2011-12
school year to be completed during the 2012-13 school year. The principal is fully onboard with
this plan of action. She suggested
that I start right away collecting the data on discipline this year, as our
discipline files are archived at the end of the school year. At that point I will not be able to
access this information. She also
told me that I may not have full buy in from our staff. This is one of the issues that I am
worried about and have spoke about in our discussion board. She suggested that I try and meet with
the staff and present the data to them so they fully understand why we are
making the decision that we are making.
She still warned that full buy in may not be reached. My principal agreed that students
should be given a voice in this process.
When she’s spoken to the students that are currently having to serve
Working Lunch, they do not understand what the point of this discipline
procedure is. When she’s asked
them to come up with a new plan, they do not know and say that they’ll just
attend Working Lunch. I believe if
we use the Delphi method, we may be able to reach a consensus from the students
on a new discipline plan. The
principal told me to step back and not just go through the motions when doing
my assignments. Take a look at how
the students or teachers react when meeting with them. These can be added to my leadership
toolbox for future purposes. She
said that sometimes when a leader makes a decision, or a suggestion, a ripple
effect often occurs. You can
predict some events, but others that won’t even cross your mind arise.
In the end the principal agreed
that this is a very good research topic.
She is here to support me with whatever I need. There were no changes that were made or
additions that needed to be added.
Below is the final plan.
Goals and
objects/outcomes of the research investigation
To determine if Working Lunch is meeting the needs of all Raines High
School students as a discipline consequence.
Activities
designed to achieve the objectives
Meeting with the principal to discuss data that can be provided on the
following areas:
- # of students per day that attend Working
Lunch
-
the names of students that are habitual attendees
-
the grades of habitual attendees in 1st period and 3rd period (right
before lunch)
-
discipline referrals for the habitual attendees
-
collection of student anecdotal data
Meeting with a
group of students to discuss a problem/solution process in which their voice
will help shape the discipline/consequence structure at Raines High School
Enacting a new
discipline/consequence structure at Raines High School and collecting data on
this.
3. Resources
and research tools needed for data gathering
A log of all Working Lunch students from 2011-2012
A copy of discipline referrals that led to Working Lunch attendance in
2011-2012
A copy of attendance for the 2011-2012 school year (looking at tardies)
Grades for 2011-2012 Working Lunch attendees from 1st and 3rd
period
Time during the school day to meet with groups of students to discuss a
problem/solution process
Full cooperation of staff to enact new discipline procedure during the
2012-2013 school year
A log of students who were consequenced under the new discipline plan
from 2012-2013
A copy of all discipline referrals that led to consequences under new
discipline plan in 2012-2013
A copy of attendance for the 2012-2013 school year (looking at tardies)
Grades for 2012-2013 students consequenced under the new discipline plan
from 1st and 4rd period
Student anecdotal data, to be collected throughout the process
4. Draft
timeline for completion or implementation of activities
Gathering data starts immediately (March 2012)
Student meetings needs to occur before the end of the school year (June
2012)
Implementation of new discipline procedure needs to be agreed upon by
the staff by the start of the 2012-2013 school year (August 2012)
Implementation of new discipline procedure needs to be discussed with
students on the first day of school (September 2012)
Data needs to be collected throughout the process (September
2012-ongoing 2013)
Final analysis (May 2013)
5. Persons
responsible for implementation of the action research plan
Jonathon Gutierrez – Masters student
Becky Tucker – Principal
Alys Shorter – Assistant Principal
Raines High School Staff
Raines High School Students
6. Process
for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives
Collecting data as discussed in #3
Student anecdotal data
7. Assessment
instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action research study
Success will be measured by tardies,
attendance, grades, # of discipline referrals, promotion to the “auto” program
and possibly graduate success. Monday, March 12, 2012
Developing an Action Research Plan
1. Goals and
objects/outcomes of the research investigation
To determine if Working Lunch is meeting the needs of all Raines High
School students as a discipline consequence.
2. Activities
designed to achieve the objectives
Meeting with the principal to discuss data that can be provided on the
following areas:
- # of students per day that attend Working
Lunch
-
the names of students that are habitual attendees
-
the grades of habitual attendees in 1st period and 4th period (right
before lunch)
-
discipline referrals for the habitual attendees
-
collection of student anecdotal data
Meeting with a
group of students to discuss a problem/solution process in which their voice
will help shape the discipline/consequence structure at Raines High School
Enacting a new
discipline/consequence structure at Raines High School and collecting data on
this.
3. Resources
and research tools needed for data gathering
A log of all Working Lunch students from 2011-2012
A copy of discipline referrals that led to Working Lunch attendance in
2011-2012
A copy of attendance for the 2011-2012 school year (looking at tardies)
Grades for 2011-2012 Working Lunch attendees from 1st and 4th
period
Time during the school day to meet with groups of students to discuss a
problem/solution process
Full cooperation of staff to enact new discipline procedure during the
2012-2013 school year
A log of students who were consequenced under the new discipline plan
from 2012-2013
A copy of all discipline referrals that led to consequences under new
discipline plan in 2012-2013
A copy of attendance for the 2012-2013 school year (looking at tardies)
Grades for 2012-2013 students consequenced under the new discipline plan
from 1st and 4th period
Student anecdotal data, to be collected throughout the process
4. Draft
timeline for completion or implementation of activities
Gathering data starts immediately (March 2012)
Student meetings needs to occur before the end of the school year (June
2012)
Implementation of new discipline procedure needs to be agreed upon by
the staff by the start of the 2012-2013 school year (August 2012)
Implementation of new discipline procedure needs to be discussed with
students on the first day of school (September 2012)
Data needs to be collected throughout the process (September 2012-ongoing
2013)
Final analysis (May 2013)
5. Persons
responsible for implementation of the action research plan
Jonathon Gutierrez – Masters student
Becky Tucker – Principal
Alys Shorter – Assistant Principal
Raines High School Staff
Raines High School Students
6. Process
for monitoring the achievement of goals and objectives
Collecting data as discussed in #3
Student anecdotal data
7. Assessment
instrument(s) to evaluate the effectiveness of the action research study
Success will be measured by tardies,
attendance, grades, # of discipline referrals, promotion to the “auto” program
and possibly graduate success.
Week 3 - What I've learned
One of the best ways to get your
information out is to present your information orally. Usually throughout the year many hours
are devoted to professional learning days. This time can be used to get your information out. Teachers from around the district can
sign up to hear the information that you have gathered on the research topic
you have worked on. Also, major
education conferences are always looking for speakers to present their
information and findings. My
school just participated in the Educational SXSW conference last week in
regards to using ProjectShare from Region 4 in the classroom with students.
Also, writing your research
findings and getting them published is a great way to get your information
out. Most administrators and
continuing education students subscribe to journals and sites where information
is published. This is a great way
to get your research and studies out to an even bigger number of people.
Lastly, providing the information
from your action research plan can be used to make a change on your
campus. Sharing the information
that you have found can be provided to colleagues on your campus so they can
enact the same process. They can
further add to the research if they follow the same process that you started. This is what I plan on doing with my
Action Research Project. The
information that I gather will be used to enact a new discipline/consequence
plan school wide. I’m hoping that
my colleagues will buy in to the new approach, and in turn provide the data
necessary for my project. At the
end of the study I will provide the overall data collect from the 2011-2012 and
2012-2013 school years. In the end
a decision will be made based off of this data.
Information will be provided
along the way. The first piece of
information that will be provided to the staff and students is background
information. Working Lunch was an
idea that originally worked, but has failed to meet the needs of all our
learners
The second piece of information
that will be provided to the staff is sharing how the design process will
proceed. I will share with them
all forms of data that will be collected including, the # of students per day that attend
Working Lunch, the names of students that are habitual attendees, the grades of
habitual attendees in 1st period and 4th period (right before lunch), and
discipline referrals for the habitual attendees.
The third piece of information that will be
provided to the staff is sharing the learning from the research. After the 2-year study is completed all
the data will be presented to the staff.
An argument will be built to support my findings by providing evidence
in the form of data.
Saturday, March 10, 2012
Week 2 - What I've learned
I have met with my site supervisor to begin narrowing down my action research project. I didn't think she'd be open to at least 1 topic, but she is fully interested in all 3. It will be hard narrowing down which one I'll pick.
This week I also learned that there are 9 different areas that action research falls into. They are as follows:
This week I also learned that there are 9 different areas that action research falls into. They are as follows:
1. Staff
development
2. Curriculum
development
3. Individual
teacher(s)
4. Individual
student(s)
5. School
culture/community
6. Leadership
7. Management
8. School
performance
9. Social
justice or equity issues
I also was able to find examples for each of these categories. I believe my 3 action research topics fall into School culture/community and school performance.
Monday, March 5, 2012
3 Possible Action Research Topics
Topic #1: The purpose of my action research is to find what types of motivators are successful in motivating at-risk learners on a 90% at-risk campus to succeed in their coursework. The students at this school have seen a lot of failures in their 10-15 years of education. Different motivators including, parent involvement, rewards, peer tutoring, adult mentoring, and discipline will be examined to determine which motivator produces the greatest amount of success in a student’s semester. Success will be measured by tardies, attendance, grades, and possibly graduate success.
Topic #2: The purpose of my action research is to determine if a change in the schedule at Raines High School will have an effect on student learning and success. The plan would entail a change of the schedule including cutting the advisory period in half, moving the advisory period to the beginning of the day, shortening each class by 10 minutes, and adding and additional period to the day. Since there are a number of tardies during 1st period placing advisory at the beginning of the day will mean students are not missing out on key topics in their core content courses. Adding an additional period on to the day will mean that students are have the ability to pick up additional content courses in areas that they may struggle. If they struggle in science, they may have 2 science courses they are working on concurrently. If the student is struggling with a certain core subject area on their standardized test, a remediation period can be added in this slot to all core content teachers. The need of the remediation periods can be researched ahead of the start of the semester to determine the number of students that need the remediation and the number of remediation courses that will need to be offered.
1st period – Advisory – 7:35 – 8:00
2nd period – 8:03 – 9:13
3rd period – 9:16 – 10:26
4th period – 10:29 – 11:40
Lunch – 11:40 – 12:10
5th period – 12:13 – 1:23
6th period – 1:26 - 2:35
Saturday, March 3, 2012
How Educational Leaders Can Use Blogs
Blogs can be used as a means of collaboration. The information that an educational leader, teacher, or district administrator possesses can be shared to an infinite number of people in any area of the world. This wealth of knowledge does not need to be confined to just 1 person, it needs to be shared for all to see. In the world we live in today people sometimes don't have the amount of time it takes to read an entire journal or article. The Blog allows for a short snippet of information that can then be further researched if the reading party is interested.
What I have learned about Action Research Plans
Inquiry is a powerful tool used to help principals learn while at the
same time help to improve their schools.
Administrators use it to gain deeper insight into their role as an
administrator and their job as leader in improving their schools. Administrative inquiry is a methodical
process. Each question asked and
each piece of data or information collected is very calculated. The data collected in this process
provides a better understanding for the administrator and ultimately helps
shape his/her decision which at this point should be more successful. Administrators are life long learners and
their staff development should focus on helping students succeed and
achieve. Through administrative
inquiry, this is often possible.
Many times in our schools we are subjected to mass produced district, state, and even nation wide staff development. The individuals that come in to our schools do not know us as teachers, do not know our students, and do not know our community and needs. The information they provide us is based off research that someone else has done. This is traditional educational research. Action research differs in that the people actually involved in the day-to-day of the school are involved. These individuals design the plan themselves, collect the data themselves, and interpret the data based off of the original question posed. Knowledge is gained based off of the realities of the environment. Outside researchers are not involved in this process as they are in traditional educational research. The individuals involved in the action research ultimately research the process which tends to make them feel more accountable which in turn facilitates change.
There are many benefits to using an action research plan as a teacher. Teachers study their own students learning allowing them to reflect on their current teaching practices and continue to improve student learning. Action research is data driven and brings about change based on these results. Teachers can reflect based off of the results of their action research plan. Teachers using an action research plan will continually be motivated to improve their teaching based off of the results of their students.
The area that I am most interested in researching is that of student motivation. Working in an alternative, 90% at risk campus, I would like to know what motivates our students. Is it rewards? Is it discipline? Is it a close bond with an adult? Is it parent involvement? Is it dreams of a better and brighter future? Many of the students that I work with are very apathetic towards anything in regards to their education. Note that I said many. Not all students are like this. I'd like to tap into what currently motivates these few students to achieve and achieve at a high level. Concurrently, I'd like to explore what will motivate the students that are not currently motivated. I'd like to put some of my ideas in motion as well as some of the students ideas in motion and compare the short and long term effects of these motivators.
Many times in our schools we are subjected to mass produced district, state, and even nation wide staff development. The individuals that come in to our schools do not know us as teachers, do not know our students, and do not know our community and needs. The information they provide us is based off research that someone else has done. This is traditional educational research. Action research differs in that the people actually involved in the day-to-day of the school are involved. These individuals design the plan themselves, collect the data themselves, and interpret the data based off of the original question posed. Knowledge is gained based off of the realities of the environment. Outside researchers are not involved in this process as they are in traditional educational research. The individuals involved in the action research ultimately research the process which tends to make them feel more accountable which in turn facilitates change.
There are many benefits to using an action research plan as a teacher. Teachers study their own students learning allowing them to reflect on their current teaching practices and continue to improve student learning. Action research is data driven and brings about change based on these results. Teachers can reflect based off of the results of their action research plan. Teachers using an action research plan will continually be motivated to improve their teaching based off of the results of their students.
The area that I am most interested in researching is that of student motivation. Working in an alternative, 90% at risk campus, I would like to know what motivates our students. Is it rewards? Is it discipline? Is it a close bond with an adult? Is it parent involvement? Is it dreams of a better and brighter future? Many of the students that I work with are very apathetic towards anything in regards to their education. Note that I said many. Not all students are like this. I'd like to tap into what currently motivates these few students to achieve and achieve at a high level. Concurrently, I'd like to explore what will motivate the students that are not currently motivated. I'd like to put some of my ideas in motion as well as some of the students ideas in motion and compare the short and long term effects of these motivators.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)